Saved
Outerwear

Trench coat

A raincoat designed for officers in the mud became the uniform of people who’ve never seen a trench.

Worth your time?4.5/5Yes.Wear the whole thing.What works, what does not, who it is for ↓
10:28in productionCh. 1 · Commissioned, not conceived/ 10:28 · ceiling 15 min
5 chapters · 10:28Ceiling 15:00

The brief is written and checked. The video joins this page when it is cut.5 chapters · 1 min read · 10:28 planned

Read the brief

The trench coat is a functional garment that solved a narrow military problem. Its civilian life is a story of displacement—not evolution.

Chapters & takeaways5
  1. 0:56
    Commissioned, not conceived

    It was commissioned by the British War Office—not invented out of inspiration—and built for a specific rank, before the First World War.

  2. 2:18
    Function first, every stitch

    Every detail—from the storm flap to the buckled cuffs—was engineered for use in trenches, not style.

  3. 3:23
    Not built for cold

    It fails as winter wear. Its sizing and fabric assume it will be layered over the British Warm.

  4. 4:36
    Adopted, not inherited

    Civilian adoption came after military use—not alongside it, and not by choice of the original users.

  5. 6:04
    One problem, one solution

    The gabardine trench coat was a complete system: fabric, cut, and hardware designed as one response to a single brief.

2 more chaptersFewer chapters
Worth your time?

Yes. Wear the whole thing.

4.5/ 5
What works
  • as an object lesson in functional design
  • as evidence of how quickly utility becomes aura
What does not
  • art
  • subculture
  • movement
  • ideology
Wear it if
  • designers
  • historians of material culture
  • people who own one and wonder why it doesn’t keep them warm
Skip it if
  • anyone expecting symbolism or rebellion
Who should wear it, and who should skipHide who it is for
The written brief1 min read

What the thing is

A double-breasted, belted raincoat made from lanolin-waterproofed gabardine. Khaki-coloured. Built for British Army officers. Features storm flaps, button-closing pockets and epaulettes, raglan sleeves with buckling cuff straps, and D-ring belt clasps.

Where it came from

Thomas Burberry designed it in 1900 after a commission from the British War Office to replace heavy military coats. It emerged before the First World War and was worn by officers in the trenches.

What it gets right

It solves a precise problem: keeping officers dry in wet trenches while allowing mobility, layering over the British Warm, and carrying gear. Every feature—storm flap, buckled cuffs, epaulettes, D-rings—has a documented battlefield purpose.

What it gets wrong

It is routinely misused as cold-weather outerwear. It was never designed for thermal insulation. Its generous sizing and breathable gabardine make it inadequate as sole winter protection.

Why it matters now

It remains the default visual shorthand for competence, restraint, and quiet authority—despite being stripped of its original function, context, and user group.

Is it worth your time

Yes—if you care about how functional design becomes cultural shorthand, and want to see what happens when military pragmatism gets repackaged as civilian authority.

Same rail · Outerwear4 of 33
Up next in Fashion

Tommy Hilfiger

Tommy Hilfiger · 8:28

Preppy wasn’t born on Ivy League quads—it was rebuilt in Times Square after a bankruptcy.

8:28